Randomised Trial Support for Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures
نویسندگان
چکیده
We investigated the proportion of orthopaedic procedures supported by evidence from randomised controlled trials comparing operative procedures to a non-operative alternative. Orthopaedic procedures conducted in 2009, 2010 and 2011 across three metropolitan teaching hospitals were identified, grouped and ranked according to frequency. Searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) were performed to identify RCTs evaluating the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Included studies were categorised as "supportive" or "not supportive" of operative treatment. A risk of bias analysis was conducted for included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. A total of 9,392 orthopaedic procedures were performed across the index period. 94.6% (8886 procedures) of the total volume, representing the 32 most common operative procedure categories, were used for this analysis. Of the 83 included RCTs, 22.9% (19/83) were classified as supportive of operative intervention. 36.9% (3279/8886) of the total volume of procedures performed were supported by at least one RCT showing surgery to be superior to a non-operative alternative. 19.6% (1743/8886) of the total volume of procedures performed were supported by at least one low risk of bias RCT showing surgery to be superior to a non-operative alternative. The level of RCT support for common orthopaedic procedures compares unfavourably with other fields of medicine.
منابع مشابه
Correction: Randomised Trial Support for Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures
article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
متن کاملNegative pressure wound therapy for management of the surgical incision in orthopaedic surgery
OBJECTIVES The period of post-operative treatment before surgical wounds are completely closed remains a key window, during which one can apply new technologies that can minimise complications. One such technology is the use of negative pressure wound therapy to manage and accelerate healing of the closed incisional wound (incisional NPWT). METHODS We undertook a literature review of this eme...
متن کاملInternet based patient education improves informed consent for elective orthopaedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND Obtaining informed consent is an essential step in the surgical pathway. Providing adequate patient education to enable informed decision making is a continued challenge of contemporary surgical practice. This study investigates whether the use of a patient information website, to augment patient education and informed consent for elective orthopaedic procedures is an effective measu...
متن کاملA Randomised Controlled Trial
A. Carr, DSc FMedSci , Nuffield Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery C. Cooper, MSc, Senior Trial Manager J. Rees, MD, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Science, NDORMS D. J. Beard, DPhil, Professor of Musculoskeletal Sciences; CoDirector, Royal College of Surgeons Surgical Trials Unit (SITU-Oxford) University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, ...
متن کاملClosed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery.
BACKGROUND Closed suction drainage systems are frequently used to drain fluids, particularly blood, from surgical wounds. The aim of these systems is to reduce the occurrence of wound haematomas and infection. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of closed suction drainage systems for orthopaedic surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Speci...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 9 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014